1924: Davis vs Coolidge
President Harding initially presented the concept of talking to the public on the radio in 1921 but it was not up until the 1924 governmental election that it was actually used. By this time millions of Americans had getting sets in their living-room and they were all expecting to hear what the prospects had to state. Such a huge importance was put on this new innovation that Coolidge and Davis were in fact made to being in a glass booth on-stage, in-front of 16,000 individuals, and told to avoid their normal pacing backward and forward, to guarantee that the microphone would get whatever they said.
Throughout the country schools were closed so that students could listen and individuals huddled around radios in outlet store and in your home. Sales of receiving sets hit a record high and 'Nation' magazine printed that "1924 would be reviewed as the radio year". For the first time the American citizens had the ability to eavesdrop on a presidential election, thanks to this brand-new technology.
1960: Nixon vs Kennedy
The very first ever telecasted presidential argument was broadcast on Sep 26th 1960 and it was an occasion that altered the face of US politics permanently. The 88% of Americans who saw it on TV were witness to an entirely different picture - one of Nixon looking frail and weak from a recent operation, as well as sweating and looking really nervous. In contrast, Kennedy looked calm, confident and strong and there was no doubt that, for those who had actually seen it with their own eyes, he had won.
2012: Obama vs Romney
The photograph of President Obama hugging his better half has become the most re-tweeted post in the history of Twitter and this is a fitting nod to the huge part that this website has actually had to play in the recent US Election. The reality that it was posted prior to Obama even required to the phase to thank his supporters face to face highlights how crucial this social media platform was to his campaign. At one point on the election night, users tweeted at a rate of 327,452 per minute.
Facebook was likewise used to its full potential by both prospects with the fan pages and member-to-member interactions along with more initial and interesting concepts such as https://rotherhamandbarnsleylibdems.org.uk/about-us/ an 'I Voted' button at the top of news feeds, that is responsible for an approximated third of a million extra people voting alone.
It has actually been 15 years since sports politics landed the Springboks the Ellis We Trophy, the World Cup of Rugby under the most challenging of scenarios. Sports politics was the last thing on anyone's mind.
Amidst all the reforms and favorable outlook in a post-Apartheid period, the tension in South Africa between the white Afrikaner ex-ruling class and the bulk black population still sizzle beneath an obvious state of reform and favorable outlook. All that changed when the underdog Springboks, against all odds and expectations beat the overwhelming favorites, New Zealand. In an incredible stroke, Nelson Mandela has actually summoned not just a World Cup win, but began a healing process of change within a violence-ravaged nation so staved of peace and consistency for centuries. It proved that there is a part for sports to play in the intricate world of political differences, strive and struggles in our modern-day societies. This sort of sports politics has a lot of potential for us to explore.
There are those that argue that sports and politics do not blend. They declare that there is no such thing as sports politics. They claim that both are of different character and extremes. The former is gentlemanly, enthusiastic and non-violent. While the latter is unforeseeable, uncalled for, and frequently expressed in the violent types of war, racism, riots and discontent. We can not deny such qualities of sports and politics. But if we look deeper at sports and politics, both are basically battles of a various kind. As George Orwell when stated, "sport is generally war minus the shooting".
If only mankind can resolve their differences by sports politics on the football field rather than the battle field. If only, Hitler tries to prove his racial supremacy in sports field instead of in the death camps of Auschwitz. If only, the soldiers of this world are more excited to don their jerseys than their combat equipment. If only political leaders can let a video game choose the fate of nations, instead of mobilize for war. Life on earth would be more meaningful, harmonious and tranquil with sports politics. Individuals can than set about their jobs without fear of their race, color, religious beliefs or birth rights. Yes, there is room for us humans to evoke this spirit of sports politics to resolve our world's problems.
Why are we so excited still to bear arms and risk death. I think that in this modern-day world of weapons of mass destruction, we should seriously consider using other ways like sports politics to solve our distinctions and construct a better world. If we don't and continue to resort to war and violence, there will be not much of a location for us to call home.